|
In The News: Week of Feb 21st |
|
|
|
|
Written by Enrique A. Sanchez Montellano
|
|
Feb 24, 2011 at 03:49 PM |
|
This week has started to show that the community is responding to our call.
There are 3 stories from this week
- OWASP - Has it Reached a Tipping Point?: The founder of OWASP, Mark Curphey, posted something of a rant about the current state of OWASP and part of the discussion about Ethics is centered around the Cenzic 232 patent issue.
From the article: "This is a firm that was founded by the same people that founded HB Gary.
Yes the same firm that has been exposed to have been plotting a
campaign to discredit wiki-leaks. Cenzic also have a patent for web
fuzzing. Now I am not a lawyer but this patent appears that it could be
applied against OWASP projects like WebScarab at any time. This is the
same firm that used to claim in their marketing that they scan for the
OWASP Top Ten. Thats right using HTTP they scanned for insecure crypto!
These are my personal opinion but this is not a firm with good ethics
yet is actively involved in OWASP."
- The Curious Case Of Patent 232: Alan Shimel has written this article for Network World this week, where he referenced this site and discussed the story of Cenzic going after NTO and the wider implications.
From the article: "But lets be clear this patent goes well beyond NT Objectives and even
web application scanners. Many think this patent can apply to any
vulnerability type scanner like those used by Qualys, Rapid 7,
Metasploit, etc. This could have a major impact on the industry."
- Security Firm Strikes Back At Cenzic Patent Lawsuit Threat: This article was posted minutes ago on DarkReading which details alot of the problems with the broad nature of the patent.
From the article: "According to a penetration tester familiar with the case who requested
anonymity, the way the patent is written it could even apply to SQL
injection and cross-site scripting attacks or pen-tests. It could apply
to any products that execute these techniques for bypassing normal
security routines. "Even when I do this manually -- it would apply. So
as a pen-tester, I couldn't do that" according to the lawsuit, the
source says."
There has also been a discussion going on in the OWASP mailing list about this, and I think Rogan Dawes quote was great.
Please login or register to add comments |
|
Last Updated ( Apr 07, 2011 at 06:39 PM )
|